Max Purcell vs Marc Polmans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L L W L W L
Form
L L L W L L W L W LH2H: Purcell 5 - 5 Polmans
They have played 23 sets in total, with Purcell winning 11 and Polmans winning 12. The last match between Purcell and Polmans was at the Gwangju Challenger, 06-05-2023, Semifinals, Hard with Max Purcell getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Max Purcell | 5 |
| Marc Polmans | 5 |
Gwangju Challenger(06-05-2023)
6
0
6
2
| Purcell | Stats | Polmans |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (3-5) |
| 5 | Head-to-Head | 5 |
| 141 | Ranking | 428 |
| 40 | Highest Rank | 116 |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 13 |
| 57% (287-215) | Career Total W/L | 55% (344-281) |
| $1,208,460 | Career Prize Money | $642,775 |
| 3 | Hard H2H | 3 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 2 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Coric PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Max Purcell
Player
Marc Polmans
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 6-4 2-6 6-3 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Max Purcell
76%
(
66 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Max Purcell
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
69)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 7-6(7) 4-6 6-2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Marc Polmans
54%
(
56 of
104)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
16
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
48 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Max Purcell
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
3
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Max Purcell
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 | |||||
| 7-6(5) 6-2 | |||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Marc Polmans
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Marc Polmans
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
10
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 | H2H Matches | 5 |
| 11 | Sets Won | 12 |
| 109 | Games Won | 109 |
| 54 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 23 |
| 1:23:41 | Average Match Time | 1:23:41 |
| 57% (318/559) | 1st Serve % | 63% (367/587) |
| 70% (224/318) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (231/367) |
| 43% (103/241) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (108/220) |
| 44% (28/63) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (26/58) |
| 42% (248/587) | Return Points Win % | 42% (232/559) |
| 50% (5/10) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (6/5) |
| 0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (6/1) |
| 17% (6/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
50%
(
53 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
9
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
61%
(
33 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
35 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Max Purcell
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Tomas Machac
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
15
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Max Purcell
57%
(
64 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
55 of
100)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
67%
(
33 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Max Purcell
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
15
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
93%
(
40 of
43)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
47 of
56)
80%
(
24 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
9 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
4
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
David Goffin
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Christopher O'Connell
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
17
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Max Purcell
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
19
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Marc Polmans
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
James Tracy
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karl Poling
Player
Marc Polmans
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Marc Polmans
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Marc Polmans
73%
(
93 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
82 of
116)
20
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
63 of
82)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
32%
(
41 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
40 of
116)
126
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Jack Bruce-Smith
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Marc Polmans
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Marc Polmans
44%
(
17 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
41
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Marc Polmans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (287/215) | Win/Loss | 55% (344/281) |
| 55% (648/539) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (795/683) |
| 51% (5863/5606) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7210/6720) |
| 59% (209/147) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (203/162) |
| 54% (29/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (98/75) |
| 51% (24/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46% (16/19) |
| 56% (25/20) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (27/25) |
| 0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 3164 | Aces Total | 1777 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1013 | Total Double Faults | 1801 |
| 1:33:52 | Average Match Time | 1:32:18 |
| 441.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.84 |
| 59% (20309/34498) | 1st Serve % | 65% (25757/39364) |
| 72% (14718/20309) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (17445/25757) |
| 51% (7170/14188) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6756/13607) |
| 40% (1272/3220) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1722/4042) |
| 38% (13496/35605) | Return Points Win % | 40% (16082/39872) |
| 44% (17/22) | Slam W/L | 40% (23/34) |
| 43% (10/13) | Masters W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (39/50) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (19/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (157/103) | Challenger W/L | 50% (159/156) |
| 73% (63/23) | Futures W/L | 71% (140/58) |
| 58% (278/480) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (333/602) |
| 31% (5/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 56% (112/200) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (91/186) |
| 59% (96/164) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (112/214) |
| 86% (270/233) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (339/287) |
| 14% (270/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (339/52) |
| 23% (231/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (284/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
